[cisco-voip] WAN Delays > 80ms for CUCM cluster?
Nick Barnett
nicksbarnett at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 15:31:54 EST 2018
We think it is happening frequently WITHOUT this command being ran. Weird
stuff happens... like deleting a speed dial and it never goes away... or
changing the distribution order on a route list that auotmatically reverts
back after a few seconds... or maybe the GUI shows it never reverted back
however it is clearly not performing the correct algo. I can duplicate the
RTT issue by raising the packet size to 1200 and doing a repeat 100
packets. it WILL give me times over 80ms. BUT, the SDL traffic is supposed
to be QOS in a certain way and I'm sure that the pings I'm doing are NOT
being classified and queued properly. It is very frustrating that I know
what I'm talking (enough to discuss with them, but it has been 7 years
since I was 100% router jockey) about and can't get them to pay attention
to a probable network issue.
I have an IP SLA running that shows average latency in the 20ms range. IP
SLA is a fake red herring if you ask me... it only looks at an AVERAGE
every 5 minutes and if there are no issues, of course it will look great.
Thanks,
Nick
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:42 PM Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
> You are able to correlate the out-of-band RTT to only when the
> dbreplication stat command is ran, or are there other times the RTT is OOB
> that isn't related to querying the replication status?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -R
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Nick
> Barnett <nicksbarnett at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:57 AM
> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] WAN Delays > 80ms for CUCM cluster?
>
> We all know the max latency is 80ms, but ours occasionally goes over. I'm
> trying to track down why but the network team cannot find an issue. We are
> able to reproduce the issue repeatedly by running "utils dbreplication
> runtimestate." Whether this is causing the issue (I doubt it) or that
> command just takes long enough to run that it will eventually find a time
> that is > 80ms (my guess Is yes)... I'm not 100% sure.
>
> We opened a case with TAC to find out what that command is actually doing,
> but they won't divulge the info that our network team needs.
>
> My theory is that it's actually calling some shell script in redhat under
> the CLI appliance layer. Has anyone investigated that? Do we know what this
> command is actually doing? Specifically, i want to know where it's getting
> those ping times... is it running a generic ping with generic datagram
> data? Is it sending a 1497 packet of 0x0000 and then 0xFFFF? Basically, I'm
> trying to give the network team something to go on because they are saying
> it's not them. (Of course they could run a packet capture and tell me
> (mostly) what it's doing, but it's hard to get their attention when they
> don't think it's on their end).
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> P.S. We have frequent DB replication issues... at least a few times per
> quarter. This is so annoying and I'm pretty sure it's due to this latency,
> but I can't get anyone to pay attention.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20181106/ee63526f/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list