[cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Interestingly enough, if you read the title, it says "Selected" - it seems you can still get the VG350-72F48E/K9 bundle in configuration tool and it doesn't get tagged with the orange AEOS tag. *shrug* but for how long?

Lelio


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Johnson, Tim <johns10t at cmich.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:31 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>; voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: RE: vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Wow, thanks for the heads up on this. We just got a 350 a few months ago and were planning to get a couple more as we migrate off our legacy pbx.

We're about to submit an order for a 320 also, so it would definitely be nice to know if that EOL announcement is coming soon!

Tim Johnson
Voice & Video Engineer
Central Michigan University
+19897744406
sip:johns10t at cmich.edu
[webexemailsig]<https://cmich.webex.com/meet/johns10t>


From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 2:35 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules


I see the VG350 has pretty much been EOL'd (February 29, 2024) in favour of ISR4K with high density voice service modules or a VG450 (which is ISR4K based).

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg-series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html

Anybody know if the VG310 and VG320 is going that path? It would be hard to assume so, since the VG400s are very low density and look like they're replacing the VG202/VG204.

I can't imagine having to fork out for a ISR4K for 24 or 48 analog ports.

Thoughts?


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190404/eecd640f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1297 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190404/eecd640f/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1871 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190404/eecd640f/attachment-0001.png>