[cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Pawlowski, Adam ajp26 at buffalo.edu
Fri Apr 5 14:16:38 EDT 2019


Not as far as we've observed, as long the app doesn't disconnect from the UCM for whatever reason it doesn't open any more sockets.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:57 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam <ajp26 at buffalo.edu>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> 
> Does this happen based on uptime or load/calls on the gateway?
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pawlowski, Adam <ajp26 at buffalo.edu>
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:46 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm aware of
> being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on a whim.
> 
> We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket counts for
> the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of things, reload the
> device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.
> 
> All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time depending on
> which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it will simply stop
> operating anyways.
> 
> The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per
> each port that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may cause
> the application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, these can stack up
> quickly we found.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> > To: Pawlowski, Adam <ajp26 at buffalo.edu>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a
> workaround?
> > Software Reload? Power Reset?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> > Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> > Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca
> >
> > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of
> > Pawlowski, Adam
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with
> > those other than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> >
> > There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get
> > cleaned up by the process, so if there are connectivity issues the
> > gateways will just not re- register or operate. It's been fixed but
> > the IOS release is not out yet. For a while we were deploying the
> > VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of this. This
> > impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become apparent.
> >
> > Adam
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list