[cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

Thu Jul 25 19:35:00 EDT 2019

Jason,

After flipping the service parameter, did it respect the immersive
bandwidth setting on the region?

Thanks,
Brian Meade

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:38 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:

> Just to circle back a Room 70 Dual is desktop video same as 8845/65.
> Testing was by adjusting either Video bandwidth or Immersive Bandwidth in
> CUCM regions and then logging into codec and seeing bit rate in use. I had
> presumed something this larger was Immersive, I was wrong.  The Unified
> Reports is a liar as Anthony said 😊
>
>
>
>
>
> The funny part is that Immersive devices don’t use the Immersive bandwidth
> setting due to the service parameter default;
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 24, 2019 12:09 AM
> *To:* Jason Aarons (Americas) <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>; Anthony
> Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for
> Video vs Immersive Video
>
>
>
>
>
> What testing did you do? Just curious. Do we know what “immersive video
> support” actually means? Does it mean you need to be talking to an actual
> IX device to get the support?
>
>
>
> Also – I noticed this. Is your SIP profile set up with Immersive?
>
>
>
>
>
> P.S. I have _*no*_ idea what I’m talking about. These are just guesses.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.* | Senior Analyst
>
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
>
> Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> *On Behalf Of *Jason
> Aarons (Americas)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 23, 2019 10:29 PM
> *To:* Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for
> Video vs Immersive Video
>
>
>
> Here is the report, but testing confirmed a Cisco WebEx Room 55 is not an
> Immersive Video endpoint.  Sort of opposite of what below indicates.
>
>
>
>
>
> Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564, MCSE: Communications
>
> Advanced Technical Consultant
>
> Dimension Data
>
> M: +1-904-338-3245 mobile/whatsApp
>
> T: +1-954-517-2033 office/Miramar
>
> x62033 Miramar
>
> Call My Video Unit 62033 at rccl.com
>
>
>
> *Together we do great things.*
>
> Dimension Data has joined 28 expert companies to become NTT.
>
> Our transition to the NTT brand will be complete soon. Visit us at
> hello.global.ntt
> <https://hello.global.ntt/?elqTrackId=3F7027E56EB15D03DBADE8E3418458AD&elq=a39c94d982094528a3908202d287fc13&elqaid=5286&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=2994>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 23, 2019 11:35 AM
> *To:* Jason Aarons (Americas) <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for
> Video vs Immersive Video
>
>
>
> I agree that the name isn't as useful anymore, but did you run the
> report?  If so, do you feel the report is accurate, or are you noticing
> something is wrong with it?
>
>
>
> Also, you didn't mention if you switched your Service Param over or not,
> else, everything uses non-immersive video by default.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:11 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
> jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>
> I can’t recall a new product from the Oslo team that said Telepresence
> it.   The last products where Cisco TelePresence DX70, Cisco Telepresence
> MX200 G2 etc.  The larger 3 panel half table conference room we all
> identify as Telepresence blah.
>
>
>
> New huddle space products customers like are the Cisco Webex Board 55,
> Cisco Webex Room 55/70.  Based on testing these WebEx Room blah are no
> longer Immersive Video (on right in Regions) but just video endpoints
> similar to a 8845/8865.
>
>
>
> Guess I was going by the video screen size.  Big meant Telepresence.
> Struggle was TAC SE didn’t know what Immersive Video vs Video was.  The
> CCIE Collab lab is pretty clear the 8845/65 are just video as you have
> tasks related to regions.
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 22, 2019 10:22 AM
> *To:* Jason Aarons (Americas) <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for
> Video vs Immersive Video
>
>
>
>
>
> Did you already change the value of Service Parameter: Use Video
> BandwidthPool for Immersive Video Calls?
>
>
>
> The classification is per version of CUCM, and thus can be queried in
> CUCM.  See below from SRND.
>
>
>
> *Endpoint Classification*
> Cisco TelePresence endpoints have a fixed non-configurable Video Call
> Traffic Class of immersive and are identified by Unified CM as *immersive*.
> Telepresence endpoints are defined in Unified CM by the device type. When a
> device is added in Unified CM, any device with TelePresence in the name of
> the device type is classified as *immersive*, as are the generic
> single-screen and multi-screen room systems. Another way to check the
> capabilities of the endpoints in the Unified CM is to go to the *Cisco
> Unified Reporting Tool > System Reports > Unified CM Phone Feature List*.
> In the feature drop down list, select *Immersive Video Support for
> TelePresence Devices* ; in the product drop down list, select *All*. This
> will display all of the device types that are classified as *immersive*.
> All other endpoints have a fixed Video Call Traffic Class of *desktop*
> due to their lack of the non-configurable *immersive *attribute.
>
>
>
> Source: CUCM 11.x SRND
> <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab11/collab11/cac.html#pgfId-1489913>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 6:51 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) <
> jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Where is there a definitive list of what is Immersive?  Is a Room 55
> Immersive?
>
>
>
> From my training the left is 88xx video and right were products formerly
> made by Tandberg such as Room 55/DX80/SX80/MX300 etc
>
>
>
> In a Room 55 trying to figure out if it is left or right side.
>
>
>
>
>
> -jason
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
> "http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer"
> <http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> itevomcid
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 923566 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10707 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1297 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 52041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20083 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2748 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190725/2cf39808/attachment-0005.png>