[cisco-voip] [External] Re: ATA 186 question

Hunter Fuller hf0002 at uah.edu
Thu Jan 27 20:33:54 EST 2022


Yes, that's correct. You can also provide 48V using an AC adapter
instead of PoE input, if you're into that. But of course, that
presumably won't be in play for an ATA 186.

--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1A
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:30 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> So, it’s POE powered itself and can send along POE as well? Without an AC adapter ?
>
> ‘Cause that would be sweet.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 27, 2022, at 7:24 PM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002 at uah.edu> wrote:
>
> 
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca
>
> The MikroTik GPEN21 can take 802.3af PoE and gigabit input, and will negotiate 10/100/1000 on the other port. It is basically a 3 port PoE powered switch where one of the ports is an SFP (and you would ignore this third port in this application).
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 18:15 Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Please let us know what your final solution is. Whether one switch with one ATA, or 100/100.  It’s good to know.
>>
>> Lelio
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 5:46 PM, Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca
>>
>> All good ideas. Thanks again!!
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 5:13 PM, James Buchanan <james.buchanan2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is also the option of keeping a few of the switches that were refreshed to use for the ATAs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:10 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Something to try is to get a cheap DLINK or Linksys switch and insert it between the new 9300uxm and the ata.  It might give you some options to get them working until you can replace them.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 4:41 PM, Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you all for your quick responses.  We will go beg for funding and replace the ATAs.  We cannot set speed to 10 since it is not an option according to our network engineer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 4:26 PM
>>> To: Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu>
>>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ATA 186 question
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You might want to double check that. From this, 17.3, it shows 10 is a valid option.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9300/software/release/17-3/configuration_guide/int_hw/b_173_int_and_hw_9300_cg/configuring_interface_characteristics.html#task_uw1_3wc_g1b
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 3:45 PM, Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp at uoguelph.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We just began Cisco switch upgrade to 9300s and ran into an unexpected issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We have many ATA 186s out there (about 100) and did not budget for replacement as we were gratefully approved for the massive overhaul of the switches.  This ended up being an unforeseen glitch.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We cannot get the ATA 186s to work on this switch with this IOS version:                               1 65 C9300-48UXM 17.03.04 CAT9K_IOSXE INSTALL
>>>
>>> However, the 186s are working on this switch with this IOS version:                                          1 64 C9300-48P 16.9.5 CAT9K_IOSXE INSTALL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I know it is not an apples to apples comparison but I was wondering if anyone had a workaround for the newer model/IOS.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We believe the problem is that the ATA186s are hard coded at 10Mbps/half duplex.  Even if we change the switch port parameter from 0x00000000 to 0x000000ff  the ATA will not register.  The switch port is also configured at duplex auto but the slowest we can make the port is 100Mbps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this not possible?  I am hoping you Cisco geniuses have a solution 😊
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lisa Notarianni
>>>
>>> University of Scranton
>>>
>>> Telecommunications Engineer
>>>
>>> Infrastructure Services
>>>
>>> 800 Linden St.
>>>
>>> Scranton PA 18510
>>>
>>> 570.941.4325
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> --
>
> --
> Hunter Fuller (they)
> Router Jockey
> VBH M-1A
> +1 256 824 5331
>
> Office of Information Technology
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
> Network Engineering


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list