[e-nsp] 6808 backplane

[Jo Rhett]

Really?  We saw this, and shortly afterwards the MSMs stopped  
communicating with each other, and the backplane partitioned traffic  
between the MSMs...

There is a component of the 6808 "passive" backplane which fails.  I  
would RMA the unit.

On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Daniel Monteith wrote:
> You are not alone.
>
> I have:
> Backplane: ┐┐┐000-00-05 001┐H-03420
>
> And have seen a few more ¿¿ in them its fine (as far as these  
> switches go) and just cosmetic.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: extreme-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:extreme-nsp-
>> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Term
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 8:16 AM
>> To: extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [e-nsp] 6808 backplane
>>
>> show version
>> Back plane: ¿¿¿¿¿¿-00-¿¿ ¿¿¿¿H-00559
>>
>> would you agree that the back plane is naffed ?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extreme-nsp mailing list
>> extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> extreme-nsp mailing list
> extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp

-- 
Jo Rhett
senior geek

Silicon Valley Colocation
Support Phone: 408-400-0550