[e-nsp] 6808 backplane

[Term]

Jo,

Thanks for that .. i'm seeing the same thing on a lab router as well ...
time to get a new switch
Term

At 01:31 p.m. 11/03/2008, you wrote:
>Really?  We saw this, and shortly afterwards the MSMs stopped
>communicating with each other, and the backplane partitioned traffic
>between the MSMs...
>
>There is a component of the 6808 "passive" backplane which fails.  I
>would RMA the unit.
>
>On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Daniel Monteith wrote:
>>You are not alone.
>>
>>I have:
>>Backplane: ┐┐┐000-00-05 001┐H-03420
>>
>>And have seen a few more ¿¿ in them its fine (as far as these
>>switches go) and just cosmetic.
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: extreme-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:extreme-nsp-
>>> >> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Term
>>>Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 8:16 AM
>>>To: extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>Subject: [e-nsp] 6808 backplane
>>>
>>>show version
>>>Back plane: ¿¿¿¿¿¿-00-¿¿ ¿¿¿¿H-00559
>>>
>>>would you agree that the back plane is naffed ?
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>extreme-nsp mailing list
>>>extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
>>_______________________________________________
>>extreme-nsp mailing list
>>extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
>
>--
>Jo Rhett
>senior geek
>
>Silicon Valley Colocation
>Support Phone: 408-400-0550
>
>
>