[F10-nsp] willing to be reference for or against Force10?

[Andy Myers]

We have a ring of S50's, so perhaps our application isn't that similar
to yours.  We've encountered some buffering issues when data transits
from higher speed (1 and 10 gig) to lower speed links (100 meg).  The
cli also seems to be evolving quite a bit so that it's closer to the E
series' cli.  F10 has been working with us to resolve our issues.

Andy

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:06:55PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> We are evaluating several architectures to replace our existing  
> Extreme Black Diamond switch backbone.  Right now the choices are to  
> use Force10 as a single provider, or Juniper routes with Cisco (or  
> Force10) functioning as a port aggregation switch.
> 
> Is anyone here willing to be a reference either for or against using  
> Force10 as both port aggregation and border routing?  I'd happily buy  
> you a beer/tea/poison-of-choice to hear about the scorch marks :-)
> 
> -- 
> Jo Rhett
> senior geek
> Silicon Valley Colocation
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> force10-nsp mailing list
> force10-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp
>