[f-nsp] Multipath iBGP question
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Tue Nov 2 13:13:40 EST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I know that ECMP (Equal cost multipath) for iBGP is a bad idea,
so this is only a "lab" question (i.e this is not in production!)
here is the question:
(apologies if this ASCII art is not formatted correctly)
[Router A]------------------[Router B]
~ | |
~ | |
[Access Router A] [Access Router B]
~ | |
~ | |
[Customer Prefix] [Customer Prefix]
~ 10.0.0.1/32 10.0.0.1/32
Both Router A and B are BI4K MGR4 Ironcore devices
with the following configured:
!
ip load-sharing 4
!
router bgp
maximum paths 4
!
Access Router A and B connected to them
are belonging to $other_vendor,
redistributing their statics for the customer prefix (10.0.0.1/32)
into iBGP.
How do the Bigiron RouterA/B know what the correct next-hop
is for the customer prefix using multipath?
In the lab, traffic arriving on Router A destined for the customer
prefix (10.0.0.1) is being sent to Router B
Upon arriving at Router B its then being sent back to Router A
sometimes!!!
Both devices are running 07.06.01B and have also been running 07.06.05
I would have assumed that the process would have instructed the CAMs
to have been built in such a way as specifically NOT to send traffic
back in the direction from which it came.
Is this not the case?
The implementation of multipath seems to work well on the $other_vendor
kit....
Thanks in advance.
- --
David Freedman
Network Engineering Department
Claranet UK Limited
http://www.clara.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBh83+tFWeqpgEZrIRAtJUAKCsnLdn1PaYblSiOj52s71GsHOiTQCgmjJ0
Bq9zSfQlMtsVyURNPqzSgTA=
=B9eo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list