[f-nsp] Ibgp Routes.

A. Krijgsman - QCC a.krijgsman at quality-control-centre.net
Mon Mar 6 17:18:45 EST 2006


Hi All,

Does anyone has an explination for this?
- Two routers in VRRP-E.
- IBGP session between them.

Why don't the IBGP peers sent eachother their entire received full-transtit
routes?
Does not make sense to me :-(

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Armand


Summary:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RT1:
SSH at ams-gs-rt1>show ip bgp summary
  BGP4 Summary
  Router ID: 195.144.2.2   Local AS Number : 35829
  Confederation Identifier : not configured
  Confederation Peers:
  Maximum Number of Paths Supported for Load Sharing : 1
  Number of Neighbors Configured : 2, UP: 2
  Number of Routes Installed : 325556
  Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors : 118348
  Number of Attribute Entries Installed : 61441
  Neighbor Address  AS#   State   Time     Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent
ToSend
  195.144.2.3       35829 ESTAB   3d 9h59m    143228   0        118347 0
  217.170.9.129     24785 ESTAB   4d12h11m    182327   0        1      0


RT2:
SSH at ams-gs-rt2>show ip bgp summary
  BGP4 Summary
  Router ID: 84.233.188.98   Local AS Number : 35829
  Confederation Identifier : not configured
  Confederation Peers:
  Maximum Number of Paths Supported for Load Sharing : 1
  Number of Neighbors Configured : 2, UP: 2
  Number of Routes Installed : 297731
  Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors : 143226
  Number of Attribute Entries Installed : 52427
  Neighbor Address  AS#   State   Time     Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent
ToSend
  84.233.188.97     8928  ESTAB   7d 2h57m    179398   0        1      0
  195.144.2.2       35829 ESTAB   3d 9h58m    118332   0        143225 0







More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list