[f-nsp] Ibgp Routes.
A. Krijgsman - QCC
a.krijgsman at quality-control-centre.net
Mon Mar 6 17:18:45 EST 2006
Hi All,
Does anyone has an explination for this?
- Two routers in VRRP-E.
- IBGP session between them.
Why don't the IBGP peers sent eachother their entire received full-transtit
routes?
Does not make sense to me :-(
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Armand
Summary:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RT1:
SSH at ams-gs-rt1>show ip bgp summary
BGP4 Summary
Router ID: 195.144.2.2 Local AS Number : 35829
Confederation Identifier : not configured
Confederation Peers:
Maximum Number of Paths Supported for Load Sharing : 1
Number of Neighbors Configured : 2, UP: 2
Number of Routes Installed : 325556
Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors : 118348
Number of Attribute Entries Installed : 61441
Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent
ToSend
195.144.2.3 35829 ESTAB 3d 9h59m 143228 0 118347 0
217.170.9.129 24785 ESTAB 4d12h11m 182327 0 1 0
RT2:
SSH at ams-gs-rt2>show ip bgp summary
BGP4 Summary
Router ID: 84.233.188.98 Local AS Number : 35829
Confederation Identifier : not configured
Confederation Peers:
Maximum Number of Paths Supported for Load Sharing : 1
Number of Neighbors Configured : 2, UP: 2
Number of Routes Installed : 297731
Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors : 143226
Number of Attribute Entries Installed : 52427
Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent
ToSend
84.233.188.97 8928 ESTAB 7d 2h57m 179398 0 1 0
195.144.2.2 35829 ESTAB 3d 9h58m 118332 0 143225 0
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list