[f-nsp] Looking for throughput infos
Niels Bakker
niels=foundry-nsp at bakker.net
Fri Sep 15 06:40:40 EDT 2006
* kristian at spritelink.se (Kristian Larsson) [Thu 14 Sep 2006, 21:47 CEST]:
>>We are moving away from Foundry in favour of Cisco 6500 with Sup32s
>>which really packs a punch, has a lot more features and on top of it is
>>cheaper than our old BI4ks. I recommend everyone else to do the same.
The hardware you're comparing has almost a decade of engineering between
them...
* gk at ax.tc (Gerald Krause) [Thu 14 Sep 2006, 22:31 CEST]:
>Ack. But how about the MLX? If Foundry has made his homework well the new
>systems should be much more better then the legacy ironcore/jetcore stuff
>because all the nasty and *obvious* problems has been reported so often that
>I can't believe that Foundry doesn't take note of it (unless they still do
>not position their gear in the internetworking area but only in the layer2
>and metro services scope).
Very different indeed. Completely new architecture that does much, much
better in about all environments than the old JetCore does.
-- Niels.
--
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list