[f-nsp] What is the prefered way to add a vlan to a topo-group
Erich Hohermuth
eh at solnet.ch
Thu Jan 3 09:23:42 EST 2008
Hi
This feature is now implemented on MLX and XMR ;-)
Section: Auto Shutdown Beginning with release 03.7.00, you can use the
new of BGP Neighbors on Initial global auto-shutdown-new-neighbors
command Configuration the router bgp configuration to disable
establishment of the BGP connection with a remote peer when the peer is
first configured.
Regards
Erich
Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 15:01 +0100 schrieb Peter Olsen:
> Hi Gunther,
>
> Yes, it have been reported long time ago. Foundry do not consider it as a bug as the code is doing was is expected from it... so, it is a feature request
>
> br,
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gunther Stammwitz [mailto:gstammw at gmx.net]
> Sent: 3. januar 2008 14:58
> To: Peter Olsen
> Cc: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net; goverton at nwi.net
> Subject: AW: [f-nsp] What is the prefered way to add a vlan to a topo-group
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> did you already report this bug / feature request to foundry?
>
> This is as annoying as the problem with new bgp neighbors:
> After configuring a new bgp neighbor with "nei 1.2.3.4 remote-as 123" the mlx automatically starts to bringt the session up which is a problem because you don't have a chance to configure route-maps first.
> Cisco is expecting the user to use the command "nei 1.2.3.4 activate" or "no nei
> 1.2.3.4 shut" once so that the router knows that the configuration has been completed.
>
> I hope that foundry is going to implement this feature soon...
>
> Regards,
> Gunther
>
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag von Peter
> > Olsen
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 08:15
> > An: goverton at nwi.net; foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Betreff: Re: [f-nsp] What is the prefered way to add a vlan to a
> > topo-group
> [...]
> > If thats the case there is only one way to prevent a loop and that is
> > to take a physical port down.
> > To my opinion this is a bug, e.g. if you strictly follow the manual
> > you will create a loop unless you follow the manual recommandation
> > about taking a physical port down.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
--
* Erich Hohermuth IP Engineer - SolNet (AS 9044) PGPKEY-46A08FCB *
* phone: +41 32 517 6220 / sip:9044*463 at inoc-dba.pch.net *
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list