[f-nsp] Foundry and Cisco UDLD different?

[Andreas]

I would guess that they are incompatible the
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-foschiano-udld-03.txt is
preatty new and I guess that the "standards" for it isn't implemented
correct in one of the platform. I  guess you could ask Foundry or Cisco
if they do support UDLD between different vendor devices.

Regards Andreas


On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:50 +0100, Christian Bering wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Googling the archives I haven't been able to come up with an answer to
> subj.
> 
> I am unable to establish UDLD between a Cisco 7600 and a Foundry MLX.
> I have tried setting the Foundry values to what I think is default on
> Cisco, but with no luck:
> 
> SSH at dr1.nybf#show link-keep
> Total link-keepalive enabled ports: 1
> Keepalive Retries: 5    Keepalive Interval: 7 * 100 MilliSec.
> 
> Port    Physical Link   Link-keepalive  Logical link  
> 1/3     up              down            down          
> 
> 
> cr1.hors#show udld tenGigabitEthernet 4/1
> 
> Interface Te4/1
> ---
> Port enable administrative configuration setting: Enabled
> Port enable operational state: Enabled
> Current bidirectional state: Unknown
> Current operational state: Advertisement
> Message interval: 7
> Time out interval: 5
> No neighbor cache information stored
> 
> Are they incompatible or am I just using wrong values?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christian Bering
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp