[f-nsp] SuperX / SX800 used for routing?

[Mike Allen]

Alex, either the SuperX or SX800 can be equipped with the Layer 3 routing
package, the real difference is whether or not you need redundancy in the
switch fabric/management module.  The SuperX supports a single mgmt module,
the SX800 and 1600 can be configured with dual/redundant management blades.
It should be fine for what you are describing, but I will let the list
respond in that regard.

Mike

On Jan 15, 2008 1:08 PM, Alexander Koch <efraim at clues.de> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> some ppl will surely think I am crazy to continue asking. Is anyone using
> a SuperX or SX800 for real routing, BGP and some 10G or so of traffic?
>
> I have a few folks that say the box was giving issues and all, but is
> anyone doing this right now, and is it actually working? Also for those
> it is not / was not working out, can you please speak up and tell me?
>
> I am of the understanding also the SX800 is what I want if I want to have
> some more traffic and a little BGP, right?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20080115/f66675b9/attachment.html>