[f-nsp] ServerIron 4G Dest-NAT

[John G.]

yes, those boxes can do that although i would caution u on the SI4G.  we
tried running those boxes and they sucked monkey nuts.

they would just all of a sudden decide to stop passing network traffic.  and
the real kicker was that we had 2 running in HA mode!!  the secondary still
saw the primary as up but the primary wouldn't respond to any network
requests.  lame!!! painful to troubleshoot.  we had to scream at foundry to
get them to take those boat anchors back and give us the GTCs.  i would make
sure they have fixed their problem with these things... something to do with
some internal buffer filling up and not doing the standard FIFO thing or
some such.

-jg


On Jan 22, 2008 8:47 AM, Gerald Krause <gk at ax.tc> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> is it possible doing Destination-NAT load balancing with a SI4G?
>
> We have to migrate an existing setup where the old LB performs
> Destinantion-NAT from official IP space to RFC1918 IP space and the
> servers
> and applications behind rely on the original client IPs so Source-NAT is
> not
> an option. I'am unsure if a SI4G (Premium L3 Version) can do that - any
> thoughts?
>
> --
> Gerald   (ax/tc)
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20080122/7d43b3e0/attachment.html>