[f-nsp] ip (ve) limit on serveriron 4g

[Oliver Adam]

Additional IPs do not get populated to the BPs and they can not be 
used for load balancing if I remember correctly.

FastIrons are a different product with different limits.

R, Oliver


At 01:16 15.11.2008, Stephan van Hienen wrote:
>What is exatly happening when i create a new vlan with ve/ip ?
>
>SSH at foundry02(config)#vlan 210 name testvlan by port
>SSH at foundry02(config-vlan-210)# tagged ethe 3 to 4
>added tagged port ethe 3 to 4 to port-vlan 210.
>SSH at foundry02(config-vlan-210)# router-interface ve 61
>SSH at foundry02(config-vlan-210)#interface ve 61
>SSH at foundry02(config-vif-61)# port-name "* VLAN210 gateway *"
>SSH at foundry02(config-vif-61)# ip address 192.168.134.1 255.255.255.248
>Error! Maximum number of IP reached 64
>SSH at foundry02(config-vif-61)# ip vrrp vrid 61
>SSH at foundry02(config-vif-61-vrid-61)#  owner
>SSH at foundry02(config-vif-61-vrid-61)#  ip-address 192.168.134.1
>SSH at foundry02(config-vif-61-vrid-61)#  activate
>VRRP router 61 for this interface is activating
>
>I receive the error Maximum number of IP reached 64, but It looks 
>like the vlan/ve are still activated ?
>(and I can ping the ip 192.168.134.1 from a remote device)
>
>But still looks like I have to search for a new device (extra maybe)
>I can keep the servers which need loadbalancing on the serveriron.
>
>So what about the fastiron (FES12GCF)  same limitation ?
>
>Thnx,
>
>Stephan
>
>
>On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Mischa Peters wrote:
>
>>This is a limit on all the ServerIron platforms.
>>
>>Mischa
>>
>>
>>>Interesting.  Is this limit the same on all ServerIrons in the product
>>>line? or just the 4g?
>>>-Ryan
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>[mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Oliver Adam
>>>Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:22 AM
>>>To: Mischa Peters; Stephan van Hienen
>>>Cc: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>Subject: Re: [f-nsp] ip (ve) limit on serveriron 4g
>>>Mischa is correct - you can define up to 64 IPs which is a hard
>>>limit. I am sorry for that.
>>>R, Oliver
>>>At 21:21 13.11.2008, Mischa Peters wrote:
>>> > Hi Stephan,
>>> > > The amount of virtual interfaces is also (unfortunately) limited by
>>> > the 64 IP limit.
>>> > This is a combined limit for both source-ips and VEs.
>>> > > Mischa
>>> > > > Hmms didn't think I would hit the serveriron's limit that soon... :(
>>> > > But how is this related to the maximum ammount of virtual-interface
>>> > > then ? (which can be 512)
>>> > > > > So no other options than just buying another pair of foundry's ?
>>> > > (not sure if I need to buy serverirons, since i would be able to
>>> > > move ve's which don't use loadbalancing)
>>> > > > > Thnx,
>>> > > > > Stephan
>>> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Mischa Peters wrote:
>>> > > > > > You can not change that limit, that is a hard limit on the BPs of
>>> > > > the ServerIron.
>>> > > > > > > Mischa
>>> > > > > > > > When I tried to create another vlan with ve I got 
>>> the following
>>> > > > > message :
>>> > > > > Error! Maximum number of IP reached 64
>>> > > > > In the past I also had a maximum vlan, which I could fix by using
>>> > > > > system-max vlan.
>>> > > > > But I can't find anything about this ip limit in the documentation/
>>>specs.
>>> > > > > Any hints how to fix this ?
>>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > > > foundry-nsp mailing list
>>> > > > > foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > foundry-nsp mailing list
>>> > foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>foundry-nsp mailing list
>>>foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp