[f-nsp] Foundry XMR [user based rate limiting]

[Cole, Patrick]

Valeri,

If I understand you correctly, there is no way to do what you want except to rate limit each customer IP based on ACL match individually.  This will quickly run in to resource limitations and isn't scalable.

Regards,

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Valeri A
Streltsov
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:24 AM
To: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [f-nsp] Foundry XMR [user based rate limiting]


Hi

May somebody knows does XMR supports user based rate limiting?

As I see from documentation in traffic policing "Up to 990 Port-and-ACLbased
policies can be configured for a port under normal conditions".

I have several thousands of customers, most of them have same "tarif" with
fixed access speed.
Totally about 20 different speeds should be provided.

It should (by my meaning) looks like:

All customers with access speed, for example, 5Mbps should be in one ACL and
should have one rate-limit rule where described speed and that each IP have
separate "speed tube".

Any ideas? Or may be there is another one way to do it?

Valeri Streltsov
TiERA Broadband Operator
http://www.tiera.ru
Tel. +7 812 6111116
Fax +7 812 6220272



_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or
dissemination of this email or its attachments is
prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.
Before opening or using attachments, please check for
viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any
affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the
organisation.
************************************************************************