[f-nsp] Policy based routing question

[Joseph Hardeman]

Ok,

I now have a little more idea on what is causing my problems.  Its VRRP
causing my ip policy route-map to not work.  When I remove VRRP from a VLAN
I am testing with my route-map works properly but stops working when I
re-apply the VRRP Config.

Any ideas on why VRRP would break a ip policy route-map?

Thanks everyone

Joe

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joseph Hardeman <jwhardeman at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have a question about Policy based routing.  I have setup my access-list
> and route-map like the examples I have found online and also tried it with
> the example in a Manual I have for the Foundry.  On a VLAN with multiple
> subnets its not working.  I have all of the subnets included right now in
> the access-list I setup and I have set the next-hop in my route-map, but I
> can't seem to get it to send that traffic through the next hop I want too.
>  It is instead using BGP routing to send the traffic out for these subnets.
>
> interface ve 200
> ip address a.a.a.a 255.255.255.128
> ip address b.b.b.b 255.255.255.128
> ip address c.c.c.c 255.255.255.0
> ip address d.d.d.d 255.255.255.128
> ip policy route-map test-next-hop
>
> access-list 30 permit a.a.a.a 0.0.0.127
> access-list 30 permit c.c.c.c 0.0.0.255
> access-list 30 permit b.b.b.b 0.0.0.127
> access-list 30 permit d.d.d.d 0.0.0.127
> access-list 30 permit e.e.e.e 0.0.0.127
>
> route-map  test-next-hop permit  10
> match ip address  30
> set ip next-hop z.z.z.z
>
>
> When I apply this route-map to a vlan with a single subnet it works just
> fine and is sending the outbound traffic to the next hop I told it to, just
> not on the vlan with multiple subnets.  Anyone know why it might be having
> this problem?  And how to fix it?
>
> Thanks for any insight or help.
>
> Joe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20100215/24d0b46b/attachment.html>