[f-nsp] SI-350 vs SI-4G-SSL

[Chase Bolt]

Mischa, 

How come your numbers are much different then the link below? You are showing 10mil concurrent sessions and the pdf shows 15mil. 

http://www.cpssales.com/documents/Foundry-Brocade/Foundry-ServerIron-350-450-850-Datasheet.pdf 


Thanks, 
Chase Bolt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mischa Peters" <foundry at high5.nl> 
To: "Chase Bolt" <cbolt at denirostaff.com> 
Cc: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:42:03 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] SI-350 vs SI-4G-SSL 

Hi Chase, The reason why it's almost impossible to get an SI-4G-SSL is because the unit is end-of-life. The Whole JetCore ServerIron line has been replaced by the ServerIron ADX. In the SI-350 you can stick a WSM6-SSL1 or a WSM6-SSL2. The WSM6-SSL-1 performs slightly better than an SI-4G-SSL, but the WSM6-SSL2 performs much better. Additionally you get an extra slot in the SI-350, either for an extra line card or for an extra management card. Here are some marketing numbers: 

[image/png:Screen shot 2010-07-23 at 07.41.03 .PNG] 

Mischa On Jul 23, 2010, at 01:39 , Chase Bolt wrote: > I can’t find a single vendor who has two SI-4G-SSL in stock and their recommendation would be to get an SI-350 with a SSL management card. Apparently they can get the price lower than the SI-4G-SSL which makes me think the SI-4G-SSL is a better unit; we all know higher the price better the unit right? > > Would it be best to hold out for the SI-4G-SSL or does the SI-350 perform equally? Is there a downside with going SI-350 besides increased U size? > > > Thanks, > Chase Bolt > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20100723/b5c4d8f5/attachment.html>