[f-nsp] Best practise for dual-stack IPv6 on Jetcore-based devices

George B. georgeb at gmail.com
Mon Feb 7 11:46:38 EST 2011


5.1 is MLX/XMR code, is it not?
These are BigIron ... or do they run the same code base?  I don't know as I
don't run BI. But "JetCore" would tend to indicate ASIC and not FPGA.



On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Arjan Van Der Oest <Arjan at voiceworks.nl>wrote:

> On 7Feb, 2011, at 11:36 , Mischa Peters wrote:
>
> > The only unfortunate thing is that VRRP-e doesn't support IPv6.
>
> As far as I know this was introduced in 5.1 and is my main reason to
> upgrade to this version. Am I misinformed?
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Arjan van der Oest
> Senior Network & Systems Engineer / Security Officer
>
> Voiceworks BV - Editiestraat 29 - 1321 NG Almere
> Mobile : (+31) (0)36 7600 197
> Voiceworks winnaar Gouden FD Gazelle Award 2010 http://bit.ly/eksf8V
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110207/a078e792/attachment.html>


More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list