[f-nsp] FESX648 vs. NetIron CES 20204

[Chen, Qinxue]

We only need basic routing + switching, IPv4+IPv6, vrrp, some ospf, no
BGP, no hidden limits on ACL +PBR (like FESX448 has 1024 acl lines
limit).


________________________________

From: George B. [mailto:georgeb at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:11 PM
To: David
Cc: Chen, Qinxue; foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] FESX648 vs. NetIron CES 20204


I would say that greatly depends on the application and design of the
network.  What is the application?




On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:13 PM, David <webnetwiz at gmail.com> wrote:


	NetIron is the way to go. It's a newer platform that runs
software that powers the bigger switches like MLX and XMR. More
features, more memory, and smaller form-factor.
	
	David 


	On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Chen, Qinxue
<QChen at corp.untd.com> wrote:
	

		Does anyone have experience on NetIron CES? Is it stable
enough to
		compare with FESX? We are trying to make a decision on
which one to
		choose.
		
		_______________________________________________
		foundry-nsp mailing list
		foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
		http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
		



	_______________________________________________
	foundry-nsp mailing list
	foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
	http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110223/5e23d348/attachment.html>