[f-nsp] FESX648 vs. NetIron CES 20204
George B.
georgeb at gmail.com
Tue Feb 22 23:10:44 EST 2011
I would say that greatly depends on the application and design of the
network. What is the application?
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:13 PM, David <webnetwiz at gmail.com> wrote:
> NetIron is the way to go. It's a newer platform that runs software that
> powers the bigger switches like MLX and XMR. More features, more memory, and
> smaller form-factor.
>
> David
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Chen, Qinxue <QChen at corp.untd.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have experience on NetIron CES? Is it stable enough to
>> compare with FESX? We are trying to make a decision on which one to
>> choose.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110222/586fcf9e/attachment.html>
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list