[f-nsp] Tagged interfaces

[Josh Farrelly]

Hi Eric

For the most part, yes to both.

Take a look at this document here (pages 19 & 20): http://community.brocade.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/1848-102-1-3553/Brocade-Cisco%20Comparison.pdf

Kind Regards,

Josh Farrelly
Infrastructure Architect, ICTS.
Manukau Institute of Technology

From: Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com<mailto:elouie at yahoo.com>>
Date: Friday, 5 October 2012 11:07 AM
To: "foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [f-nsp] Tagged interfaces

I'm preparing to translate some Foundry configurations to Cisco.



As far as I can tell, the tagged interfaces are really just 802.1q trunk ports.  Is that an accurate assessment?



Foundry allows multiple IP addresses on the Ethernet interface.  Do I have a choice to use vlan interfaces and/or Ethernet sub-interfaces on the Cisco to provide the same functionality?


Much appreciated,
Eric Louie

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20121004/fda1e3f1/attachment.html>