[f-nsp] RFP on VE Interfaces Roadmap

[Brad Fleming]

Thanks for the reply. 
I don't see that detail in the ConfigGuide.. do you happen to know if it's expected behavior or just a glitch that hasn't been fixed yet? And do you happen to know what happens if the VLAN has multiple ports, some with RPF configured and others that don't?


On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Ryan Harden <hardenrm at uchicago.edu> wrote:

> I wouldn't hold your breath. Last I was told this is an architecture limitation on the MLX(e) platform.
> However, uRPF can be configured on a physical interface and will be processed for each VLAN/VE that traverses that physical interface. 
> 
> Caveat: uRPF is disabled on a physical interface IF a VLAN on that interface has a VE that is not in the default VRF.
> 
> Yes, you should beat your account reps up about this. :)
> 
> /Ryan
> 
> Ryan Harden
> Senior Network Engineer
> University of Chicago - AS160
> P: 773-834-5441
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Brad Fleming <bdflemin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Any chance someone on the list knows if / when the XMR or MLXe series will be able to do reverse path checks on VE interfaces?
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>