[f-nsp] Experience with 5.4.00c on XMR?

[Kevin Hodle]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Brad,

  We recently did a test roll-out of 5400C in the lab, and
subsequently on a production backbone router for observation
(primarily to remedy some defects which are fixed since the 5300
train). So far, it has been completely stable. Hardware is XMR 4000's
with mixes of NI-XMR-10Gx4 and BR-MLX-10Gx4-X, standard SFM's. Running
OSPF, IS-IS, eBGP, iBGP full-mesh member with >1 million routes
installed..

  My only advice would be to keep a close on which FPGA image versions
end up on your LP's if you are running a mix of both -X and legacy
4x10GE cards, the combined image installer doesn't seem to like this
scenario and I had to manually copy FPGA images in these cases.

HTH,
Kevin

On 05/08/2013 04:17 PM, Brad Fleming wrote:
> Anyone on the list have experience running IronWare 5.4.00c on 
> XMR4000s with high capacity switch fabs, 1x20G, and 4x10G line
> cards? We're planning software updates for the summer and that
> looks like a reasonably deep release but it's only been on the
> street for about 6 weeks. Just wondering if anyone has experiences
> either way regarding this software release. Thanks in advance!
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp
> mailing list foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRisjXAAoJEKN7/EfaiEoZwf4H/0/qOMjtxmKXk3FZQtNDb2Si
UE65EANbzQDc5ZhtlFlsENoJrPeu6yZ6CGwdK7B8gVsXQ0A5bJn8KQeziGONyxKW
7y30HP+lJm617/GWUSfSHSeDAejZnfzbuLGcAK43CyZYLrm4yxnKxf0EgmYCH6qK
SybLeKdZkQ81CoTUeEnl3iGijxWHrfAJt6rr6A4R9IBHFdvs2JITiKPtY6wEQMCm
M4PJrzCClRohqRO1b21jsaQZMBUHX0kyMqFihKRuw23t2YAZl0xd+MMersGPPrrN
sUNlxzvMxDPBSSGv2eQViMQdwMWH7PT7Q4I9gMujjOCzyqbOqMhFHM+AoqVPVx8=
=v/sC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----