[f-nsp] Brocade FCX LACP and Stack

Mike Allen mkallen at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 16:26:21 EST 2013


That should not be the case, you can do either active or passive LACP
across stack members, with both lacp ports up and forwarding/load
balancing.  Maybe you were on an older version of code?  Even then I do not
recall that being a limitation.

Mike


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Brant Ian Stevens <
branto at argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:

> Not the stack...  I meant the LACP uplink... :P
>
>  Brant Ian Stevens <branto at argentiumsolutions.com>
>  November 13, 2013 at 2:21 PM
>  Dear Everyone,
>
> I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across stack
> members resulted in the stack only being active/passive...  Please correct
> me if I'm wrong...
>
> Regards,
> Brant.
>  Brant Ian Stevens <branto at argentiumsolutions.com>
>  November 13, 2013 at 1:57 PM
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across stack
> members resulted in the stack only being active/passive...  Please correct
> me if I'm wrong...
>
> Regards,
> Brant.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20131113/3b15a1c2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1347 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20131113/3b15a1c2/attachment.jpg>


More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list