[f-nsp] NetIron 5.8f feedbacks

Daniel Schmidt daniel.schmidt at wyo.gov
Tue Mar 21 18:10:11 EDT 2017


To follow up, I've been much happier with 05800fa.

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Tony Sarendal <tony at polarcap.org> wrote:

>
> 2017-01-28 11:08 GMT+01:00 Clement Cavadore <clement at cavadore.net>:
>
>> Hello Daniel,
>>
>> On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Schmidt wrote:
>> > I use the new 10x20 10G cards, which require 5.8.  The cards are not
>> stable
>> > for us, they crash periodically.  And, we had one or two mlx reboot for
>> no
>> > reason.  Things were better when we ran 5.6.  Of course, perhaps 5.8
>> would
>> > be more stable without the cards so a grain of proverbial salt applies.
>>
>> Did the TAC advised you something ? I am running 5.8.00ec on MLXe with
>> BR-MLX-10Gx20 cards with no specific issues. The previous versions used
>> to have a known bug with some ipsec packets which could crash the
>> system. have a look there: TSB 2016-242-A & defect 617836
>>
>> I previously talked about this defect on this mailing list, on
>> 22-Sep-2016 12:18:22 (+2)
>>
>>
> I have a dozen routers with 10Gx20, both -X2 and -M, running without
> issues.
> I would prefer to keep it that way so any updates on your situation would
> be appreciated.
>
> Regards Tony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>

-- 

E-Mail to and from me, in connection with the transaction 
of public business, is subject to the Wyoming Public Records 
Act and may be disclosed to third parties.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20170321/4e505ade/attachment.html>


More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list