Heathkit Question

[Ken Allen]

Hi All,

I agree with George with the addition of the SB-640 Remote LMO for
the SB-102 station.  You might also want to substitute the SB-303
receiver for the SB-301, unless you wanted to keep it completely
hollow-state.

73
Ken

Date:          Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:09:05 -0500
Reply-to:      George Gleim <george at QNQ.COM>
From:          George Gleim <george at QNQ.COM>
Subject:       Heathkit Question
To:            HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV

Hello Green guys,

I have a question that I'd like to put to the group and ask that you
share your comments with all.


The question is:

If Heathkit were to 're-manufacture' any single Amateur Radio product
(radio and/or complete station) which radio(s) should it be and why.

For example, I think that the SB-102 Transceiver, HW-23 Power Supply,
and SP-600 Speaker would be the best choice followed VERY close by the
Heathkit SB-401, SB-301 twins and SP-600 Speaker.

Both of these radio stations represent quality engineering, ease of use,
ease of service, and represent a formidable Ham Station even when put
next to todays 'computer' radios.

Your thoughts, please.

Thanks!

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff HEATH
Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff HEATH
Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --