[Heath] Yet more on my IP-27...
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Sat Jun 23 13:54:33 EDT 2012
On 23 Jun 2012 at 8:56, Ron wrote:
> > don't leave those old electrolytics in there!
>
> I am not sure I agree. I've restored many, many Heathkit instruments
> and in just about all, electrolytics that measured OK stayed that way
> for a long time. Of course, all electrolytics will go bad *eventually*
> -- including brand new ones -- but this may happen 20 years later, or
> 50 years, or tomorrow...
>
> -- Ron
Well, I suspect from what I have seen in this instrument while restoring it that
it had been abused over a long period of time by students at a University
teaching lab.
I am not too surprised at finding bad electroltyics in it.
However, although I don't routinely replace electrolytics in the equipment I
restore, I have found too many bad or leaky or leaking or weak ones to put
much faith in them...even when new.
When I finally replaced all the electrolytics in one of my SB-200s after one
failed (rather spectacularly too), all the remaining caps tested at less than 1/2
of their original capacitance: many were down to 1/3 of their original value.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the Heath
mailing list