[Heath] Yet more on my IP-27...
Mo
mdilli at nnwifi.com
Sat Jun 23 18:00:20 EDT 2012
One of the best parts is that the ESR meter will measure in-place
capacitors. No unsoldering unless it measures defective.
73 de
Mo, AK4RM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: heath-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:heath-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jerry Haigwood
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:27 PM
> To: kgordon2006 at frontier.com
> Cc: Heath at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [Heath] Yet more on my IP-27...
>
>
> Ken,
> There has been considerable discussion of old
> electrolytic caps and how to determine if they need replacing
> on another couple of lists I am on. One of the best ways to
> determine a bad electrolytic cap is NOT by measuring the
> value of capacitance but rather measuring the ESR. The ESR
> should be only be an ohm or two at most. Many times an older
> electrolytic will measure correct capacitance but have an ESR
> of 10-20 ohms which is bad. The higher ESR will cause
> heating and in some cases, an explosion as the electrolyte
> heats up to the point of causing pressure buildup or physical
> leakage! If you don't have an ESR meter, you might consider
> building or buying one for future repairs. I know some
> people who measure the ESR on all the electrolytic caps
> before they actually start the repair. Jerry W5JH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: heath-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:heath-bounces at puck.nether.net]
> On Behalf Of Kenneth G. Gordon
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 12:55 PM
> To: Ron; Robert Groh
> Cc: Heath at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [Heath] Yet more on my IP-27...
>
> On 23 Jun 2012 at 8:56, Ron wrote:
>
> > > don't leave those old electrolytics in there!
> >
> > I am not sure I agree. I've restored many, many Heathkit instruments
> > and in just about all, electrolytics that measured OK
> stayed that way
> > for a long time. Of course, all electrolytics will go bad
> *eventually*
> > -- including brand new ones -- but this may happen 20 years
> later, or
> > 50 years, or tomorrow...
> >
> > -- Ron
>
> Well, I suspect from what I have seen in this instrument
> while restoring it that it had been abused over a long period
> of time by students at a University teaching lab.
>
> I am not too surprised at finding bad electroltyics in it.
>
> However, although I don't routinely replace electrolytics in
> the equipment I restore, I have found too many bad or leaky
> or leaking or weak ones to put much faith in them...even when new.
>
> When I finally replaced all the electrolytics in one of my
> SB-200s after one failed (rather spectacularly too), all the
> remaining caps tested at less than 1/2 of their original
> capacitance: many were down to 1/3 of their original value.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> _______________________________________________
> Heath mailing list
> Heath at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heath mailing list
> Heath at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5089 - Release
> Date: 06/23/12
>
More information about the Heath
mailing list