[Heath] Fw: Heathkit SB-610
Morris
mdilli at nnwifi.com
Wed Mar 7 19:25:29 EST 2012
I may be wrong but I've always expected the capacitance of coax to be
expressed from shield to center conductor, not serially. In this case you
would not have a simple series connection of two capacitors and the
equipment in question.
Morris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: heath-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:heath-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dick KF4NS
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 2:43 PM
> To: ma.locksmith at juno.com
> Cc: Heath puck list; heathkit at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Heath] Fw: Heathkit SB-610
>
>
> Ok guys, most responses have been related to the coax. Since
> there is no loss in the 610 and the vert amp
> is doing its job the loss is obviously in the originating
> equipment. Also, Heath does not say you should
> use RG-62, it only mentions the best coax for the xmit
> input/output. There they say to use 50 or 75 ohm
> coax.
>
> I was doing some thinking (bad for someone my age) and
> remembering electronics school, as I recall
> capacitors in series are equal to a value lower than the
> lowest capacitance. (smaller than the smallest
> as I remember) so my 5uuf cap in series with the 93ohm coax
> should result in total capacitance less than
> the 5uuf cap in series.
>
> Hmmmm! Is my age showing or am I thinking correctly. Some
> have said they use all different types of coax
> with no trouble. What if I used just a piece of insulated
> wire from the 2nd IF to the jack on the xcvr
> back and use coax from there to the 610 ?
>
> 73, Dick KF4NS
> St Petersburg, FL 33714 USA
> Keep The Glow!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ma.locksmith at juno.com>
> To: <kf4nsradio at verizon.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Heath] Heathkit SB-610
>
>
> | Yes, the coax IS faulty.... but, not because it's broken
> |
> | You have selected wiring with very high capacitance. This makes a
> | capacitive divider for the signal. If you only have 5 pF
> capacitance
> | in the cable, you have a 2:1 reduction in signal strength.
> |
> | RG174 and RG58 have high values. I think the 58 is 32 pF
> per foot.
> | Not sure about the 174 unless I look it up.
> |
> | I expect the "right" cable between the set and the 610 will
> be RG 62.
> | And, more than likely, unshielded wire inside.
> |
> | Ed
> | K1ZOK
> |
> | On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:50 -0500 "Dick KF4NS"
> | <kf4nsradio at verizon.net>
> | writes:
> | > Looking for your input and recollection of what you did.
> I have now
> | > completed a full restoration of my SB-610 and have concluded that
> | > the one remaining fault, low vertical gain, may be due to how I
> | > have connected it to my HW100.
> | >
> | > It did work pretty good at one time so now there is a bit of head
> | > scratching. I have no losses in the 610 and the vertical
> amp, when
> | > driven with a sig gen at 3395khz modulated at 50%, I see
> .4v (spec.
> | > recommends .5v input) at the grid and get 23v at the plate. That
> | > sounds like the 610 is doing the job.
> | > The vertical gain pot is fine. So now I suspect it has to be the
> | > connection to the rig.
> | >
> | > I used RG-174 in the HW100 from the second IF plate and
> have a 5uuf
> | > cap in between. Outside the rig I have a short run of
> RG-58 to the
> | > 610. I can only see .1v from the rig. The coax is not
> faulty nor is
> | > the capacitor.
> | >
> | > What did you use in your Heathkit rig for coax and
> coupling cap. and
> | > what did you feed the 610 with? Did you connect to the first or
> | > second IF and at the control grid or the plate? I did do a mod to
> | > the 100 which lowers the IF gain to improve gain
> distribution. This
> | > came from my friend Mark's (WB8JKR now SK)
> | > presentation for optimizing the HW/SB transceivers. When the scope
> | > was working fairly good this mod was
> | > already there. I did realign the rig though at some point since
> | > then. The 100 is working great.
> | >
> | > Thanks and 73, Dick KF4NS
> | > St Petersburg, FL 33714 USA
> | > Keep The Glow!
> | >
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > Heath mailing list
> | > Heath at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath
> | >
> |
> | ____________________________________________________________
> | 53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
> | The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
> | http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f56a369cf49522b580cst01duc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heath mailing list
> Heath at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4856 - Release
> Date: 03/07/12
>
More information about the Heath
mailing list