[Heath] Problems with HW-101 - a possible solution
Gordon Gwillim
ve5uj at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 18 22:26:18 EST 2020
Hi Ken. Reading other contributions to this thread I am getting a better handle on the mentality of the kit building folks. I "inherited" an HW100 from a senior that I had been in contact with for over 20 years. Another ham and I divided up the equipment that Dan had left for us and I took home the HW100. Got to it about a year later to discover that it indeed was "new" and the VFO was "way off in the hinterland" so could not possibly ever have ever worked properly. Old Dan was a bit like me in that the philosophy was something like "I'll get around to troubleshoot that thing someday". We got working on a new repeater in the district and he was so involved that he didn't get back to the 100. The repeater was very successful in 1975 and has been a tribute to Dan ever since. Best wishes for success with the 101, Ken.
Greetings of the Season and thanks for the great stories 73Gordon, VE5UJ
On Friday, December 18, 2020, 8:03:00 a.m. CST, Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com> wrote:
Hello again, Gang:
At the suggestion of another list member, I checked the position of the notches in the
bandswitch wafers.
Of the 5 wafers, three are completely backwards. The only 2 which are correct are the final
tank coil section, and the heterodyne oscillator crystal section.
What I cannot figure out is why, given this situation, that 80, 40, and (sort of) 20 worked at all.
But, I'm not going to bother to figure that out.
After I have corrected this problem, we'll see what is left.
Thanks to all.
Ken W7EKB
_______________________________________________
Heath mailing list
Heath at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/heath/attachments/20201219/0c11ce0e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Heath
mailing list