[j-nsp] JUNOS Equivalent to CISCO IOS next-hop-self

harry harry at juniper.net
Mon Dec 15 20:17:02 EST 2003


I think this assumes that a color has been set with an incoming policy. As I
understand, color is purely a local function, and routes have none unless a
color is associated with import policy.

HTHs




> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Daniel Roesen
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:57 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS Equivalent to CISCO IOS next-hop-self
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:51:45PM -0800, Pedro Roque Marques wrote:
> > > Which is generally a bad idea because color influences 
> the best path 
> > > decision process (if only as a very late criteria).
> > 
> > I don't believe that is correct.
> > 
> > In what do you base yourself ? i.e. is that written somewhere ?
> 
> Yes:
> 
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos61/swconfig61-routing/ht
ml/protocols-overview4.html#1014007

See paragraph below "Alternate and Tiebreaker Preferences".

It's a more detailed modifier to the route preference.

So, looking from the "How the Active Route Is Determined" it is influencing
even actually very early in the best path decision process.
:-)


Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list