[j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0

[Hangu Jeong]

That's true.
But If we are running scheduled auto-configuration generator on 
management station ,that is a big issue. 

Regards,
Han
--- Original Message ---
From: "Ben Buxton" B.Buxton at Planettechnologies.nl
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:30:09 +0100
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0

>
>In this situation I would say that if you lose a RE, telnetting to a
>different IP address from the management station is the least of
>your concerns.
>
>BB
>
>>
 We use a management network via fxp0 with other devices.
>>
 I know what you mean, 
>>
 But we don't want to change the router ip address on 
>>
 management server  to telnet when RE changed case.
>>
 If we run vrrp on fxp0 with interface tracking, we can access 
>>
 always router without ip address change.
>>
 Of course we have to use predefined group re0 and re1 at that case.
>>
 
>>
 Thanks
>>
 
>>
 Han
>>
 
>>
 -----Original Message-----
>>
 From: Guy Davies [mailto:Guy.Davies at telindus.co.uk]
>>
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:39 PM
>>
 To: 'Hangu Jeong'; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>
 Subject: RE: [j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0
>>
 
>>
 
>>
  
>>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
 Hash: SHA1
>>
 
>>
 Why would you want to run vrrp on fxp0?  VRRP gives you a degree of
>>
 resilience to a default route.  Since you can't route traffic 
>>
 via fxp0,
>>
 this makes no sense at all.
>>
 
>>
 The thing to do for the 2 REs is to have an IP address for 
>>
 each.  Both REs
>>
 are live even though one is master and the other slave so you 
>>
 can log into
>>
 both of them independently.  If you use the predefined groups 
>>
 re0 and re1,
>>
 you can have an identical config on both REs which configures the IP
>>
 address of fxp0 depending upon which RE slot the config is 
>>
 being installed
>>
 on.
>>
 
>>
 Regards,
>>
 
>>
 Guy
>>
 
>>
 >
 -----Original Message-----
>>
 >
 From: Hangu Jeong [mailto:hgjeong at icraft21.com]
>>
 >
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:32 AM
>>
 >
 To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>
 >
 Subject: [j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 Hi all,
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 We have a M20 with 2 RE. 
>>
 >
 Anybody tried to run vrrp on fxp0 for router management ?
>>
 >
 Pls let me know, if anyabody have experience for that. 
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 Thaniks in advance
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 Han
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 
>>
 >
 _______________________________________________
>>
 >
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>
 >
 http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
 >
 
>>
 
>>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
 Version: PGP 8.0
>>
 
>>
 iQA/AwUBPi501Y3dwu/Ss2PCEQKD6QCdEy20aYHGz26fiwu0MI61o+60ccIAnRTn
>>
 WKY/cYap3Mic5JT1rruXyRaT
>>
 =OJaz
>>
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
 
>>
 
>>
 This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the intended
>>
 recipient only.  If misdirected, please notify us by 
>>
 telephone and confirm
>>
 that it has been deleted from your system and any copies 
>>
 destroyed.  If you
>>
 are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using,
>>
 printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or any
>>
 information contained in it.  We use reasonable endeavors to 
>>
 virus scan all
>>
 e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that 
>>
 this e-mail and
>>
 any attachments are virus free.  You should undertake your own virus
>>
 checking.  The right to monitor e-mail communications through 
>>
 our network
>>
 is reserved by us. 
>>
 
>>
 
>>
 
>>
 
>>
 
>>
 
>>
 _______________________________________________
>>
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>
 http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
 
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20030123/64af3c43/attachment.htm