[j-nsp] ERX1400's PPPoX session termination capability?

[Joe Shen]

Thanks for your instant help.

I  find that data in ERX1400 Product_Overview.pdf which is on document
CD of ERX1400. On page 1-7,  Section "Unparalleled Port Density", 
It's stated" A single ERX-1400 22.75-inch shelf supports more than
24,000 fractional T1 terminations and up to 100,000 IP interfaces, while
drawing less than 25 Amps of power".

If you like  I'd send it to your email box.


regards

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Hellberg [mailto:Chris.Hellberg at telecom.co.nz] 
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 10:59 AM
To: Joe Shen; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] ERX1400's PPPoX session termination capability?


The limit is 32,000 active ip interfaces. Have you got the link handy
for the 100,000 limit?

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Joe Shen 
	Sent: Mon 6/21/2004 2:47 p.m. 
	To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [j-nsp] ERX1400's PPPoX session termination capability?
	
	

	Hi,
	
	
	I'm reading Juniper's ERX1400 product overview  But I noticed
there is
	some data conflicting with each other.
	
	In the hardware overview section, it is stated 100,000 session
could be
	supported by one chassis, but  32,000 IP interface is stated in
	follwoing sections.
	
	I don't understand what's the difference between the two number
? How
	many concurrent pppox session could be supported by
	one ERX1400 chassis?
	
	
	
	Joe
	
	
	_______________________________________________
	juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
	http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
	
	


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read
it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not
copy or use any part of this communication or disclose
anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this 
communication does not designate an information system for
 the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------