[j-nsp] PIC Compatibility Matrix

[Paul Goyette]

Whether or not it works, using the wrong PICs in a system does
void your warranty as well as make it very easy to cause damage
to the PIC and/or FPC when inserting or removing them.

Just say "No!"  :)

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jonas Frey
(Probe Networks)
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 1:52 AM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Cc: ras at e-gerbil.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PIC Compatibility Matrix


Wow, and i thought i was already voiding warranty :)


-Jonas

On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 01:03, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:49:21PM +0100, Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
wrote:
> >
> > A PE Module will definitivly not work in a M160, thats mainly because it
> > has a completly other design and form factor.
>
> As stated in other e-mail, this will work perfectly fine provided you
> screw on the little black plastic rails that expand the P/PE card width to
> M160 size. You can also screw on an M160 faceplate, or if you're really
> ghetto fabulous you can run it without (or with a home-made plate).
>
> > I am not sure if these rules apply if you are using FPC2/3 or E-FPC or
> > even FPC-E, but i think they still will.
>
> The T-series FPC1/FPC2 direction seems to be to support the actual M160
> PICs instead of issueing a new series, so there is probably no reason you
> couldn't put a PE in a T320-FPC1...


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp