[j-nsp] Missing routes in bgp.l3vpn.0 table

Affandi Indraji affandi.i at pacific.net.sg
Mon Nov 15 23:25:57 EST 2004


Hi Andrew,

Nope, it is not hidden. rc1 does not receive it at all.

Here is the output show from rr and rc1:
=======================================================
rr advertise the routes to rc1
show route advertising-protocol bgp 10.1.1.81 table bgp.l3vpn.0

bgp.l3vpn.0: 51 destinations, 107 routes (51 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
  Prefix                  Nexthop              MED     Lclpref    AS path
  65232:900100:150.85.0.0/16
*                         10.2.2.19	           0       100        ?
  65232:900100:192.168.0.0/16
*                         10.2.2.19            0       100        ?
  65232:900100:192.168.1.0/24
*                         10.2.2.19            0       100        ?


BUT rc1 doesn't receive it at all.

show route receive-protocol bgp 10.1.1.4 table bgp.l3vpn.0 all

bgp.l3vpn.0: 0 destinations, 0 routes (0 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)

============================================================================
=

and definetely we can reach the next-hop:
ping 10.2.2.19
PING 10.2.2.19 (10.2.2.19): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.2.2.19: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=1.479 ms
64 bytes from 10.2.2.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=1.471 ms
64 bytes from 10.2.2.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=1.529 ms

/affandi

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Ramsey [mailto:akramsey at juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:55 PM
To: Affandi Indraji; J-nsp
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing routes in bgp.l3vpn.0 table


Hi,

Does client1 not receive them or does it receive them, but they are
hidden?  Common cause of the latter would be that client1 doesn't have a
"usable" next-hop to the RR (no LSP, etc...).

Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Affandi Indraji
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 4:56 AM
> To: J-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] Missing routes in bgp.l3vpn.0 table
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone encounter this before?
>
> Here is the scenario.
>
> rc1 --- rr --- rc2
>
> The route client1 doesn't received any routes advertisement
> from route reflector even though the route reflector has sent
> the routes to the route client1. While route client2, which
> has the same configuration, receive the advertisement from
> route reflector.
>
> rc1-----------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> -
> group RR {
>     type internal;
>     family inet {
>         unicast;
>     }
>     neighbor 10.1.1.4 {
>         local-address 10.1.1.81;
>         family inet {
>             unicast;
>         }
>         family inet-vpn {
>             unicast;
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> show bgp sum
> 10.1.1.4     65232     121123      87742       0       8
> 5:01:05 Establ
>   inet.0: 10256/75296/0
> -->  bgp.l3vpn.0: 0/0/0
>
> rc2-----------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> group RR {
> type internal;
> family inet {
>     unicast;
> }
> neighbor 10.1.1.4 {
>     local-address 10.1.1.82;
>     family inet {
>         unicast;
>     }
>     family inet-vpn {
>         unicast;
>     }
> }
>
> 10.1.1.4     65232    5778389     959172       0       3
> 4w5d13h Establ
>   inet.0: 87139/152181/0
> -->  bgp.l3vpn.0: 39/39/0
>
> rr------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> group RC {
>     type internal;
>     family inet {
>         unicast;
>     }
>     cluster 1.1.1.1;
>     neighbor 10.1.1.82 {
>         preference 170;
>         local-address 10.1.1.4;
>         family inet {
>             unicast;
>         }
>         family inet-vpn {
>             unicast;
>         }
>         vpn-apply-export;
>     }
>     neighbor 10.1.1.81 {
>         preference 170;
>         local-address 10.1.1.4;
>         family inet {
>             unicast;
>         }
>         family inet-vpn {
>             unicast;
>         }
>         vpn-apply-export;
>     }
> }
>
>
> 10.1.1.81    65232      87964     137905       0       0
> 5:08:08 Establ
>   inet.0: 76963/115144/0
>   bgp.l3vpn.0: 7/9/0
> 10.1.1.82    75232     244761    3849197       0       3
> 4w5d13h Establ
>   inet.0: 27/28/0
>   bgp.l3vpn.0: 12/12/0
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> --
>
> The strange thing is, It's been working for a while and there
> is no changes on the config. And suddenly, rc1 doesn't
> receive the advertisement from rr anymore.
>
> This is what I have tried:
> 1. Reset the BGP session - still not work
> 2. remove the IPv4 bgp, so only run bgp-vpn - still not work
>
> Is it a bug? anyone has experience this before?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Fandi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/junipe> r-nsp
>




More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list