* roque at juniper.net (Pedro Roque Marques) [Sun 10 Oct 2004, 20:15 CEST]: > No, the 0.0.0.0 NEXT_HOP is simply ignored. Some Vendor C boxes syslog about it though: Oct 4 09:40:44 rtr1 6282234: Oct 4 07:40:43.261 UTC: %BGP-6-NEXTHOP: Invalid next hop (0.0.0.0) received from 2001:7F8:1::A50x:xxxx:y: martian next hop -- Niels. --