[j-nsp] High failure rates for M7i/M10i hard disks?
michael.firth at bt.com
michael.firth at bt.com
Mon Aug 22 10:51:49 EDT 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Richard A Steenbergen
> Sent: 22 August 2005 15:31
> To: Jee Kay
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] High failure rates for M7i/M10i hard disks?
>
> What model hard drive are they using on the M7i RE-5.0
> routing engines
> these days? AFAIK the M#i model RE's (5.0/5.0+) were custom-made by
> Kontron explicitly for Juniper, and aren't just existing products. I
> personally can't say enough bad things about the old IBM
> Travelstars they
> used to use, I have quite the stack of dead ones.
>
> Not to say that hard drives shouldn't be in routers,
> personally I think it
> adds an amazing amount of functionality which is worth a
> little bit of
> extra risk. I've probably replaced both the hard drives and
> compact flash
> from around 20 RE-2.0s and 3.0s, out of hundreds of them that
> I have run
> across, including some really roughly handled gear that had
> been abused in
> shipping and probably in its prior life. In my experience the
> CF fails
> more often than the hard-drive just through age, even with
> Travelstars
> involved.
>
> Really sounds like there may be a production problem with the
> RE-5.0's,
>
We seem to have a mixture in our M10is. The older ones have Fujitsu
disks, reported by 'show chassis hardware detail' as being:
FUJITSU MHS2020AT
The newer ones have Hitachi disks, reported as being:
HTS548020M9AT00
Is it these newer disks that people are seeing lots of failures with?
Regards
Michael
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list