[j-nsp] PBR inside of instance VRF

[Stefan Arsovski]

How did the your VRF at PE resolved 1.1.1.1 in the first
place to establish the session ??

If the local VRF resolved 1.1.1.1 ....the other
routers behind the other VRFs in the VPN should have
it as reachable ?? 

/stefan


--- Ezequiel Carson <ezequiel at ifxnw.com.ar> wrote:

> got it,
> 
> 	so, following the 2nd rule, i could not do it by
> this way,since my new
> "next-hop" interface is other than the ebgp session
> interface.
> 
> 	Do you know another way for doing this? change the
> next-hop of a single
> route based on the community information?
> 
> thanks
> Ezequiel
> 
> On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 18:28, Pedro Roque Marques
> wrote:
> > Ezequiel Carson writes:
> > 
> > > Is there any special issue/command/parametrer
> with running "then
> > > next-hop" inside of VRF instance?
> > 
> > No. But there are rules that you must keep in mind
> when using "then
> > next-hop" on a bgp import policy.
> > 
> > 1. If a neighbor is ibgp or ebgp multihop, then
> the next-hop must be
> > resolvable.
> > 
> > 2. If a neighbor is ebgp (non-multihop), then the
> next-hop must reside
> > on the interface that is used for the peering
> session.
> > 
> >   Pedro.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com