[j-nsp] PBR inside of instance VRF

[Bostjan Fele]

Do you next-hop address in inet.3 routing table?

Regards,
Bostjan

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Ezequiel Carson
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:33 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] PBR inside of instance VRF

Hi,
        Im trying to change the BGP NEXT-HOP on my prefixes inside of a VRF
Routing-Instance.

        Im getting this on the "sh route table VPN.inet.0 hidden detail"

  BGP    Preference: 170/-101
        Next hop type: Unusable
        Next-hop reference count: 11
        State: <Hidden Ext>
        Inactive reason: Unusable path
        ...


        this is my policy-statement configuration:

        term A {
                from {
                        protocol bgp;
                        community VPN-A;
                }
                then {
                        next-hop 1.1.1.1;
                        accept;
        }
        ....

        The address 1.1.1.1/30 is the  Remote Point-To-Point address of my
circuit, so i guess that there is no need of recursive resolution for
this.


Is there any special issue/command/parametrer with running "then
next-hop" inside of VRF instance?

Thanks in advance.

Ezequiel

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp