[j-nsp] RE: Is it possible to assign two different interface on the same node

[Eric Shih (TP/ERT)]

    Hi, Joshua
 
    But if we do not want to use aggregated interface, is there problems on what I
    implement ? OSFP with neighbors is OK with this design. Only some warning 
    message relating to identical subnet exit when commit.  Is the interface in 
    Juniper M20 a route port ? 

    BR // Eric     

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Eric Shih (TP/ERT)  
> Sent:	Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:46 AM
> To:	'juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net'
> Subject:	Is it possible to assign two different interface on the same node
> 
> Hello
> 
> I just define two vlans on two different physical interface (ge-0/1/0 & ge-1/3/0) in M20.
> These two vlans shares the same vlan id and all belong to the same subnet. And also I enable
> ospf protocol on these two interface. When I commit,  there are some warning as below. 
> Does someone have any idea of it ? Is there any potential problem to assign two different
> interface(vlan) to the same subnet on the same node ? 
> 
> [edit]
> root at TPM20# commit
> [edit interfaces ge-1/3/0 unit 100 family inet]
>   'address 10.254.11.120/25'
>     warning: identical subnet 10.254.11.120/25 is found on ge-0/3/0
> [edit interfaces ge-1/3/0 unit 200 family inet]
>   'address 10.252.14.4/27'
>     warning: identical subnet 10.252.14.4/27 is found on ge-0/3/0
> [edit interfaces ge-1/3/0 unit 210 family inet]
>   'address 10.252.13.132/27'
>     warning: identical subnet 10.252.13.132/27 is found on ge-0/3/0
> commit complete
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Eric Shih
> 
> 
>