[j-nsp] portchannel 3750 <-> Juniper M40

Alexander Koch efraim at clues.de
Mon Jun 13 13:09:09 EDT 2005


Folks,

following up on my own email... I found the problem:

Whenever I say 'encap vlan-ccc' on the port the ae0 goes
down. This is fixed in 7.1R1 and later. *sigh*

So when your AE is not up, try changing the encap and
if then comes up you know what it is...

We need to upgrade... ;-\

Regards,
Alexander

On Tue, 7 June 2005 08:52:44 +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
> [ also asked on cisco-nsp, but just in case anyone knows
> this right away. bear with me for 'crossposting' please. ]
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I have a problem that did cost me one half of this night -
> and I hope anyone can shed some light on it. I tried to
> bring up a Portchannel to a newly- deployed 3750 and it did
> not work. The two GE-PICs in the Juniper have the latest
> revision of their firmware, and it was a E-FPC, so that was
> taken care of already.
> 
> When I configured the Portchannel on the 3750 the two trunk
> ports were suspended due to LACP not being active on the
> other side -- which is correct as I did not change the
> configuration there yet.
> 
> I put the usual config for the ae0 on the Juniper, with lacp
> active, and on the 3750 that comes down to 'channel-proto lacp'
> and 'channel-group 1 mode active'. After all interface and
> Po1 were in sync the Aggregated Ethernet (/Portchannel) did
> not come up. All shut/no shut here and there did not help.
> 
> Anyone here has any ideas/clues on this? JunOS as well as
> IOS are exactly the same on several other boxes, also M40,
> also 12-port 3750. IOS was c3750-i9k91-tar.122-25.SEA.tar.
> 
> Please, any clues on that one? Would the same thing work
> 'by accident' if I leave out LACP? I have to admit I am not
> aware of all implicitations on that, and not yet fully awake
> again (sort of).
> 
> Thanks a bunch,
> Alexander



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list