[j-nsp] ISIS adjacency on the GigE interface
Harry Reynolds
harry at juniper.net
Mon Jun 13 16:57:00 EDT 2005
Have you tried tracing to see what, if any, problems are reported?
I suggest something like:
traceoptions {
file isis-trace;
flag error detail;
flag hello detail;
flag general;
}
HTHs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Johnny Kui
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:45 PM
> To: Kevin Oberman; Dave McGaugh
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ISIS adjacency on the GigE interface
>
> I changed the AFI to 49, and explicitly configured an
> interface on both sides (instead of "interfaces all" in the
> protocols section), but the problem still exists.
> But if I replaced the M10 with a Cisco router using the same
> configuration, I can establish adjacency.
> Any other thing I can try?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> Kevin Oberman <oberman at es.net> wrote:
> > From: Dave McGaugh
> > Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:48:24 -0700
> > Sender: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >
> > I'm not an ISO expert, but here goes :) You might try
> changing the AFI
> > from 99 to 49. Some docs I've read seem to suggest that the AFI is,
> > among other things responsible for defining the addressing
> format. I'm
> > not sure whether JunOS enforces such a thing, but if your
> addressing
> > structure conflicts with that which is defined for AFI 99, it could
> > create problems..
> >
>
> Dave,
>
> You have it right. AFI is the Authority and Format
> Identifier. 49 is the "binary local" space and the format is
> 20 octets. It should be used if you do not have a ANSI
> assigned NSAP. 99 is probably bogus, but I can't find my OLD
> OSI/GOSIP documentation to confirm it.
>
> >From RFC137:
>
> The only other defined Authority and Format Indicator (AFI)
> which leaves sufficient space for both an IPv6 address and
> TCP port number is the binary local AFI (49).
>
> So, if you don't have an official NSAP (probably with an AFI
> of 47), 49 is the one to use. It is 20 octets ling and
> normally in the format is written as:
> 49:xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.00
>
> Note the final 00. This is the selector byte (don't worry
> what that is) and should always be 00. It is STRONGLY
> recommended that something meaningful be encoded in the 18
> available octets. You can fit an IPv6 address in there just
> fine or do something else. Just as ling as it is unique in
> your ISIS fabric.
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Discover Yahoo!
> Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend.
> Check it out!
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list