[j-nsp] FE Memory Upgrade
Eric Van Tol
eric at atlantech.net
Tue May 10 15:31:49 EDT 2005
Actually, this is how JTAC explained it, in the context of DRAM:
Total DRAM
-----------
ukernel heap (55MB) + uncached heap (8MB) + PFE code/data seg(1MB) =
64MB
We had 99% utilization of ukernel heap. Here's the breakdown:
uKernel Heap
------------
Route : 42 MB
NH : 0.5 MB
Firewall: 1.5 MB
Shadow : 8 MB
Miscell.: 3 MB (for all other stuff)
Total : ~55 MB
SSB1(xxxxxxx vty)# show route summary
IPv4 Route Tables:
Index Routes Size(b)
-------- ---------- ----------
Default 160307 11373687 <------- main
1 4 281
2 159909 11345021 <------- logical
3 18 1289
4 18 1289
MPLS Route Tables:
Index Routes Size(b)
-------- ---------- ----------
Default 4 281
2 1 68
IPV6 Route Tables:
Index Routes Size(b)
-------- ---------- ----------
Default 3 221
1 5 389
2 3 221
3 3 221
4 3 221
Thus using significant route counts:
RT_MEM_1 = (160307 + 159909) * (72 + 24)
= ~30MB
We are using RPF checking. This leads to more overhead in the form of
route options (size 40 bytes)
SSB1(xxxxxxxxx vty)# show piles
# of Piles Allocated blocks Free blocks Name
---------- ---------------- ----------- ----
318 28082 3718 Radix tree attached nodes
2824 277267 5133 Radix tree unattached nodes
1653 160311 4989 Route options
RT_MEM_2 = (160311 + 4989) * (40)
= ~6.3 MB
The Radix tree, maintianed in the PFE, also consumes memory.
SSB1(xxxxxx vty)# show radix statistics
Type # of blocks total size
---- ----------- ----------
root 19 684
attach 28086 561720
noattach 277275 4436400
totals 305380 4998804
---------------------------------
Error type count
---------- -----
Illegal Init 0
Internal Error 0
Allocation Failed 0
RT_MEM_3 = 4998804
= ~5MB
Total route mem = RT_MEM_1 + RT_MEM_2 + RT_MEM_3
= 30 + 6.3 + 5
= ~42MB
I wish I could take credit for gathering all this information, but it
was JTAC who provided it to me. While I'm sure that the SRAM was also
severely affected, the exact problem was definitely with the amount of
DRAM in the SSB. Killing the logical-router in this M20 (which held a
duplicate copy of a full table) had brought the DRAM usage down to 70%,
which does seem to fit somewhat with your clarification, as that table
was also a "FIB" with active next-hop information.
-eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:ras at e-gerbil.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:15 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: Sabri Berisha; info at beprojects.com; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] FE Memory Upgrade
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:04:07PM -0400, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> I have no M7i experience, but I can tell you that an M20 with an SSB-E
> and 64MB DRAM/8MB SRAM could only handle about 500K routes in the Rib
> before it started to issue allocation errors. 768MB on the RE and
16MB
> SRAM on the CFEB will do you fine, as long as you're not going to use
it
> to create 15 logical-routers, all with a copy of a full BGP table ;-)
>
> I received a good explanation from Juniper about how the memory
> allocation in the SSB (or CFEB in your case) is handled (paraphrased
> from JTAC):
That would be your SRAM that ran out, not the SSB DRAM. The DRAM is used
to hold the next-hop table, which can run out if you have a large amount
of arp entries on an ethernet interface for example.
As it was described to me, the nhdb L2 descriptor size is hard coded as
a
percentage of your DRAM. On a 64MB DRAM model, this comes out to just
over
50k:
SFM2(xxx.xxx vty)# show nhdb zones
Chip Start Size Rsvd Used/Hi Water/Total Size Name
---- ----- ----- ----- -------------------- ---- ----
0 20000 01000 00000 0/0/512 8 Multicast RTP
0 21000 02400 00000 0/0/9216 1 Multicast Lists
0 23400 04400 00006 176/180/17408 1 Next-Hop Entries
0 27800 18800 0004b 856/885/50176 2 L2 Descriptors
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you have 50k arp entries on your system, it can exhaust the max L2
descriptors. The Juniper answer is to buy a new switch board which has
128MB of DRAM on it. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>
http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1
2CBC)
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list