[j-nsp] [ERX] Help needed simulating ppp users

Wed Apr 19 05:42:16 EDT 2006

Hi David,

you know that you are using an unsupported feature?
Normaly I do not use static IP address config or static interface configs, but your config seems to be ok.
Do you have still the problem when you use "ip unn lo x" on the client side and dyn. interfaces on the server side?

I guess the problem is that you run the client mode on the same LC where you terminate the PPP/PPPoE Sessions.
Do you have still the problem when you use 1/2 instead of 2/2?

Gruß
Bernd.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Guillet, David (David)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:56 PM
> To: Guillet, David (David); juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] [ERX] Help needed simulating ppp users
> 
> Hi again
> 
> 	Still me with my silly problem 
> 
> 	After researching a bit I can make it work for a 
> simulated ppp user
> but still unable to simulate a pppoe user
> 
> 	When tracing the events I can see that PADI is sent 
> from simulated
> user then it received the PADO from my configured PPPoE 
> subinterface then
> reply with a PADR and recieved (the pppoe simulated user) 
> again a PADS, the
> strange thins is tat my pppoe interface is sending a PADT 
> message closing
> the PPPoE newly created connection without any reason, the 
> lcp negociation
> could not be done. 
> 
> Here is a sample of the trace I have :
> ATM 2/2.1 is the PPPoE simulated user
> ATM 2/3.1 is the PPPoE sub interface I created
> 
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/2.1): PADI tx
> to ffff.ffff.ffff
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/3.1): PADI rx
> from 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/3.1): PADO tx
> to 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/2.1): PADO rx
> from 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/2.1): PADR tx
> to 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/3.1): PADR rx
> from 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/3.1): PADS tx
> to 0090.1a40.f2d9, connection made  using session id 6551 on 
> sub interface 1
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/2.1): PADS rx
> from 0090.1a40.f2d9, connection made  using session id 6551
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/3.1): PADT tx
> to 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppoeControlPacket (interface 
> ATM2/2.1): PADT rx
> from 0090.1a40.f2d9
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppPacket (interface ATM2/3.1.1): 
> time: 89.80, tx
> lcp confReq, id = 51, length = 19, mru = 1492, authentication 
> = chap MD5,
> magicNumber = 0x49d5f29e
> DEBUG 04/18/2006 14:49:30 pppPacket (interface ATM2/2.1.1): 
> time: 89.80, tx
> lcp confReq, id = 30, length = 19, mru = 1492, authentication 
> = chap MD5,
> magicNumber = 0x3f686196
> 
> 
> If someone has an answer I would appreciate to have it 
> 
> Regards
> 
> David
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of 
> > Guillet, David
> > (David)
> > Sent: mardi 18 avril 2006 12:26
> > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] [ERX] Help needed simulating ppp users
> > 
> > 
> > Hi nobody has an idea on this ?
> > 
> > regards 
> > 
> > david
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > > [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of 
> > > Guillet, David
> > > (David)
> > > Sent: lundi 17 avril 2006 18:14
> > > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: [j-nsp] [ERX] Help needed simulating ppp users
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 	I'm trying to simulate a PPP user using a PPPoE 
> > > connection according
> > > to KA 200. 
> > > 
> > > 	I put the following configuration on my router but I 
> > > could not make
> > > it work :
> > > 
> > > 	On ATM port 2/3 my simulated user is configured while 
> > > in slot 2/2 I
> > > create a static pppoe subinterface. Here is the conf detail :
> > > 
> > > 
> > > int atm 2/3.0
> > > atm pvc 100 0 100 aal5snap
> > > encap pppoe
> > > pppoe allow-client
> > > pppoe subint atm 2/3.0.1
> > > encap ppp
> > > ip addr 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255
> > > pppoe test-client
> > > ppp client chap hostname user1 at pppoe_dyn.lab password dynamic
> > > ppp client ip-address 0.0.0.0
> > > 
> > > int atm 2/2.0
> > > atm pvc 101 0 100 aal5snap
> > > encap pppoe
> > > pppoe subint atm 2/2.0.1
> > > encap ppp
> > > ppp auth chap 
> > > ip add 22.22.22.22 255.255.255.0
> > > ip access-route
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have an idea of why this is not working ? I also 
> > > tried to use
> > > the atm int 2/3.0.1 and atm in 2/3.0.1 commands for creating 
> > > the pppoe sub
> > > interface but it's not working either.
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > David
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 