[j-nsp] aggregate-ethernet vs mpls ?

Erdem Sener erdems at gmail.com
Thu Jun 22 02:18:10 EDT 2006


I'm just guessing, but how 'bout MTU settings on the Foundry side?

On 6/21/06, Alexandre Snarskii <snar at paranoia.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We are facing strange problem with mpls over aggregate-ethernet link.
> This aggregate-ethernet consists of 3x old (revision-a) ge-lx
> cards, which connected to foundry switches and connecting
> our routers over 10ge link. Topology is pretty simple:
>
> R1 <-3xGE-> S1 <-10GE-> S2 <-3xGE-> R2 <-stm-16-> R3
>
> Configuration is just copied from old one-ge link between routers R1 and R2
> with only adjustments needed to ae to work.
>
> Problem is the next: our management station, connected to routing instance
> on R1 (instance-type vrf, used for management) is not able to access _some_
> addresses (l2 switches really) in the same routing instance on R2....
> At the same time all l2circuits R1-R3 and R2-R3 works without problems,
> and all addresses in the same VRF under R3 is accessible from management
> station.. More than, all switches accessible in the same instance from R3..
> So, for me it looks like we have a problem only with traffic, which enters
> R2 only over aggregate-ethernet, and having only the top-label on the stack.
> Traffic entering R2 over sonet with just top-label, or any traffic
> entering R2 with more than one label seemed unaffected.
>
> Any clues on this issue ?
>
> The fact that the just _some_ of switches and only under R2 is inaccessible
> is the most mystical for me... I'm able to telnet to x.x.x.66, but
> telnet x.x.x.67 gets me "connect timeout..." (and at the same time i'm able
> to connect them from R2 using 'telnet routing-instance XXXX', so, that's not
> the connectivity problem).
> (And, yes, we know a hint about setting static-routes inside vrf instance,
> and they are present).
>
> PS: both routers in question is M20, JunOS 7.0R2.7, cards in aggregate
> are ge-lx, rev. A, customer-facing cards is ge-lh, rev B.
> Both switches are Foundry FESX424F+2XG, running 02.4.00dT3e1.
> Configuration on juniper side is straightforward:
>
> snar at R2> show configuration interfaces ae0
> description "GE-aggregate to R1 via Founfry";
> vlan-tagging;
> mtu 4488;
> aggregated-ether-options {
>    minimum-links 1;
>    link-speed 1g;
> }
> unit 0 {
>    description BackBone;
>    vlan-id 10;
>    family inet {
>        mtu 1500;
>        address A.B.C.133/30;
>    }
>    family mpls {
>        mtu 4470;
>    }
> }
>
> configuration on foundry side is simple too:
>
> trunk ethe 21 to 24
>  config-trunk-ind
>  port-name "somename" ethernet 21
>  port-name "somename" ethernet 22
>  port-name "somename" ethernet 23
>  port-name "somename" ethernet 23
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


-- 
Erdem


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list