[j-nsp] M10i can't commit configuration

[Eric Van Tol]

Sorry, I meant to send this out earlier today:

Basically, it appears that 8.2R2.4 will not allow two prefix-lists in a
single term in a policy-statement.  Here's the config of the original
policy-statement:

>show configuration policy-options policy-statement bgp-export
term 0-announce_aggregate {
    from protocol aggregate;
    then accept;
}
term 5-announce_connected {
    from {
        protocol direct;
	  prefix-list wan-subnets;
        prefix-list ge-wan-subnets;
    }
    then accept;
}
term 10-announce_static {
    from {
        protocol static;
        route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 exact reject;
        route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 orlonger accept;
    }
}
term 99-reject_all {
    then reject;
}

>show configuration policy-options prefix-list wan-subnets 
apply-path "interfaces <t1-*> unit 0 family inet address <*>";

When commenting out the 'prefix-list wan-subnets' match statement or
moving it to a different term, it works fine.  I looked through 8.2
release notes to see if there was a behavior change, but couldn't find
anything.  It works in 8.2R1.7, but not sure about other versions.  JTAC
is opening up a PR on this issue.

-evt


> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 4:35 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] M10i can't commit configuration
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I'm getting the following error when trying to commit a 
> > configuration on
> > a newly installed M10i:
> > 
> > cer1.bltmmdch-re0# commit and-quit
> > re0:
> > error: Check-out failed for Routing protocols process 
> (/usr/sbin/rpd)
> > without details
> > error: configuration check-out failed
> > 
> > We've restarted RPD and tried a 'commit full', but nothing 
> works.  I'd
> > prefer not to have to restart the entire router, but will if 
> > necessary.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> -------- eric at atlantech.net wrote:  ----------------
> 
> Nevermind - problem resolved.  Seems to be a possible bug or simply an
> undocumented syntax change between 8.2R1.x and 8.2R2.x.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Could you send the resolution to the list in case someone's 
> searching the web later on and happens across this exchange?
> 
> scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>