[j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs

[Rafał Szarecki]

Paolo,

I not understand "I would advise you to stick more towards the standards (ie
ldp instead of rsvp)". L3VPN do not consider signaling used for translort
LSP. It can be anything LDP, RSVP. There is even standard using GRE for
transport tunnel.
For signaling vpn labels, by definition MP-BGP is used.




2007/8/29, Paolo Autore <pautore at columbus-networks.com>:
>
> ?
> l3vpns is a very proven technology, very easy to setup and I would advise
> you to stick more towards the standards (ie ldp instead of rsvp) for the
> mpls signaling protocol.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Jonathan Brashear
> Sent: Wed 8/29/2007 11:15 AM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs
>
>
>
> http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200012.pdf
>
> I've been reading up on this solution and it seems very plausible &
> scalable, but we haven't tried to set it up in our lab yet.  Has anyone
> deployed this service, and if so what's your feedback on it?
>
> Network Engineer, Managed Services
> > 214-981-1954 (office)
> > 214-868-8567 (cell)
> > jbrashear at hq.speakeasy.net
> http://www.speakeasy.net <http://www.speakeasy.net/>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Rafał Szarecki JNCIE-M/T, JNCIP-E
+48602418971