[j-nsp] VPLS with 2 interfaces on the same router

[Leigh Porter]

This is a little off-topic but what's the best practice for this 
configuration? Do you usually leave some room for expansion (say 50% so 
a range of 10 will become 15)..

Also a range of 50-60 or 60-80 will be a range of 11 ;-)

--
Leigh Porter
UK Broadband


Monika M wrote:
> There was a discussion on this forum with the above subject concluding the
> below point.
>
> *The value of "site-identifier" must be equal or less then the value
> of " site-range". With your current configuration if you configure this
> VPLS service on another router the traffic won't be forwarded over the
> MPLS cloud.
> *
> But as per Juniper document, the site range specifies the total number of
> sites in the VPLS.  If this is the total number of sites, why should it be
> greatere than the site id?
>
> Assume we have 10 PEs in a instance. We will configure site range as 10 in
> all the PEs.
> The site id of individual PEs can be in any range. Could be 50-60,
> 60-70.....
> I am not able to get the dependencies between these two configuration. Had
> never come across in Juniper document also such a dependancy. Could you
> please explain the reason behind this condition specified in your mail?
>
> TIA,
> Monika
> **
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>